[ad_1]
Director David Gordon Green explains why there is a time jump in between the end of Halloween Kills and the beginning of Halloween Ends. Four years after the events of Halloween Kills, Halloween Ends sees Laurie Strode (Jamie Lee Curtis) clash with Michael Myers (James Jude Courtney), who terrorizes the town of Haddonfield for what will hopefully be the last time. Meanwhile, her granddaughter Allyson (Andi Matichak) becomes romantically involved with Corey Cunningham (Rohan Campbell), whose dark past is starting to consume him after he encounters Myers in a sewer.
Instead of directly following up on the events of Halloween Kills, the movie takes a different approach and introduces a new character with Corey, who becomes the primary focus of Halloween Ends. As Allyson grows closer to Corey, Laurie begins to worry, as she sees part of Myers’ soul in his eyes. It’s a huge departure from what previously occurred in Halloween Kills, which ended on a devastating cliffhanger. This is one of the main reasons why Halloween Ends received poor reviews from both critics and fans, as many felt the conclusion to be underwhelming, especially after retconning the events of Halloween: Resurrection for Laurie Strode to have a proper “final chapter.”
Now, in a recent interview with Collider, Green explains why Halloween Ends jumps forward in time from the events of the 2018 reboot of Halloween and Halloween Kills. It began with where the last film found Laurie, which was recovering from horrific injuries. Through the time jump, Green discovered new creative possibilities. Check out what he says on the time jump below:
“I don’t know that it changed in any radical form. There were things that we evolved. When we were writing Kills and Laurie was bedridden because she would be because she’s been stabbed in the belly a few times, I knew we needed to make a time jump. Or we decided after thinking about it. There was a period of time where it was gonna be all one linear continuous type of movie. But then how are you gonna get this climactic battle out of her? So then we made decisions to evolve it and say, ‘Okay, there’s a time jump between Kills and Ends,’ and it became a great opportunity and discovery of the fact that we can meet an optimistic Laurie Strode that has gone to therapy perhaps and she’s decorating for Halloween, she’s inviting this holiday, she’s making pumpkin pies, so we can see a Laurie that’s in many ways the opposite of the Laure that we met in 2018. And to me, that just becomes a discovery you get from workshopping the script with my beloved co-writers and talking to the actors, turning a camera on things that work and work less and then trying to sculpt something you feel like is the most satisfying. Obviously Kills is just kind of a chaotic art film middle chapter for me. It’s just a Michael Myers opera. And then Ends I just wanted to build to make sure I felt emotional, I felt atmosphere, I felt romance. I wanted it to be a love song to the fans, and I don’t think anyone’s gonna see it coming. They certainly wouldn’t expect us to make some of the choices we’ve made.”
Did Halloween Ends’ Time Jump Work in Its Favor?
Halloween Ends capping off the franchise with a time jump certainly didn’t work in its favor, especially with how the last film ended in a semi-cliffhanger ending. After Michael Myers brutally murders Karen (Judy Greer), a final confrontation between Laurie and Michael seemed to be the next logical step in the trilogy. One may argue that it was done in Halloween H20: 20 Years Later and in Resurrection, but since the new trilogy ignores the events of these two films, many would’ve appreciated a fitting end to Laurie’s saga with Michael Myers by keeping it simple.
Even with a time jump, Halloween Ends centering around a character that wasn’t previously introduced in the past two films doesn’t feel like a proper conclusion to a trilogy that, for the time being, was focused on reuniting Laurie Strode with Michael Myers. Halloween Kills was a direct sequel to the 2018 Halloween reboot, which saw a more brutal version of Michael Myers than ever before. Should Halloween Ends have followed in the footsteps of Kills, it likely would’ve received a better reception than a conclusion to a trilogy that jumps forward in time and focuses on a rivalry that isn’t Myers and Strode.
Source: Collider
[ad_2]
Source link
